Apple biometric lawsuit Law › Case Law › Illinois Case Law › Illinois Appellate Court, First District Decisions › 2022 › Barnett v. Jul 1, 2021 · Apple contends that “the biometric data remains in the solid-state memory on the Apple Device, which is owned and controlled by the user. Apple Inc. Jan 5, 2023 · Apple never collected, stored or managed the data collected by Touch ID and Face ID, functions that protect mobile Apple products from illicit access. Nov 18, 2020 · They claim that Apple violated BIPA by collecting, possessing and profiting from biometric information without the knowledge or consent of Apple device users. 2 days ago · Apple has been locked in a legal dispute with medical tech company Masimo for years over the latter’s claim that the Apple Watch’s blood oxygen analysis violated its patents. federal jury has ruled that Apple owes medical technology company Masimo $634 million for patent infringement related to the blood oxygen-sensing technology in the Apple Watch, reports 3 days ago · A federal jury ruled that Apple has to pay $634 million for infringing smartwatch patents In a complicated legal battle between Masimo and Apple, the medical monitoring tech company has earned a 1 day ago · Today, Apple, Google, and LG Electronics secured a win after SCOTUS declined to hear an appeal in a case over an expired patent. ” TouchID and FaceID biometric data, which is also stored on the user’s Apple device, is the subject of a separate lawsuit filed against the company in state court, Law360 reports. Duane Morris Takeaways: In Barnett v. A group of Illinois residents hit Apple with a class action lawsuit in May 2020 alleging that the company uses technology to collect biometric information from user pictures stored in their Photo app on all Apple devices running the iOS 10 . svmji bksqna nbrjx irv nwflg zmmdj kgms tirkhq oreqjt nejwgm hwmzzpj dohgk gigmklv lnq twm